The Bible is clear about the unpredictability of Jesus’ second coming, with numerous scriptures underscoring that no one can pinpoint this event. In Matthew 24:36, for instance, Jesus explicitly states, “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” This leaves absolutely no room for human predictions, and according to Christian doctrine, emphasizing this unpredictability is meant to encourage believers to live in a state of readiness rather than reliance on specific dates. For a self-proclaimed prophet to claim a date for Jesus’ return directly contradicts the Bible’s teachings, raising questions about the legitimacy of such “prophecies.”
The psychological impact of fear-based prophecy
Predictions of an imminent apocalypse or the exclusion of specific groups from salvation can be highly unsettling for believers. Fear-based teachings can lead to anxiety, desperation, and even irrational decisions, as people scramble to “ensure” their place in heaven. This is especially impactful in communities where people are devout, looking to religious leaders for reassurance and guidance. When cult leaders like Dr. Owuor make bold, unsubstantiated claims, the emotional and mental toll on their followers can be severe, as many may feel pressured or manipulated by the urgency created around these supposed “prophecies.”
Past instances of failed apocalyptic predictions
Historically, there have been numerous failed prophecies about the end of the world, from leaders of various religious movements. The predictions of William Miller in the 19th century, which led to the “Great Disappointment” when Jesus did not return as he claimed, or more recent claims by Harold Camping, who prophesied the end in 2011, show that apocalyptic predictions have a tendency to fail. These “false alarms” often leave followers disillusioned and financially or emotionally devastated, revealing a pattern where such predictions rarely hold up under scrutiny.
The role of accountability in religious leadership
When religious leaders make bold, public statements about divine revelations, it is essential that they be held accountable, especially when these “revelations” fail to come true. In the Old Testament, false prophecy was taken very seriously (Deuteronomy 18:22), as a test of a prophet’s authenticity was whether their prophecies actually came to pass. By making unfulfilled predictions without repercussions, leaders may inadvertently encourage cynicism and skepticism within their own communities, which can weaken faith rather than strengthen it.
Implications of selective exclusion (Nairobi case)
Concerning the controversial prophecy attributed to Owuor, the self-proclaimed “man of God” made a sensational claim that the world would end on November 2nd, and that Nairobi residents would not make it to heaven. As a Nairobian myself, I find it puzzling—why would those living in Nairobi be denied heaven, especially given the many devout believers who call the city home?
